Free Essays on Sitting Bull

Sitting Bull, said to be driven by the spirit, became chief of the Sioux tribe at an early age. His leadership included the time during in which America began its explorations of â€Å"The Great West†. In their expansion, they simply pushed the Native Americans back with promises of land and equal opportunities that were available to the whites. Throughout his reign, Chief Sitting Bull led his tribe through a number of confrontations with the American Army. The most famous of which being the Battle of the little Big Horn. However, the subject of the speech I reviewed does not deal with battling, but rather the unkept promises the American government made to the Sioux. Hearings were being conducted in Washington to hear the complaints of those who had lost land or other items of value during the war. So, the Chief had left with a delegation of his people and headed to Washington to see what was being done about the complaints the representatives from their tribe had lodged. Upon their arrival, he confronted Senator John Logan, a former civil war hero, because he had learned that the senator refused to acknowledge a single complaint made by the Sioux representative. In reaction to Logan’s arrogance, Sitting Bull became angered and accused Logan of â€Å"acting like a man drunk with whiskey.† Realizing that anger and finger pointing would get him nothing, Sitting Bull returned the next day in hopes of repairing the damage caused the previous day. Though first and foremost he was making an apology, he still wanted to express his resentment toward the United States government for the broken treaties and lies they had made with the S ioux tribe. His introduction was somewhat expected by those attending the hearings, so it did not make much of an impact but probably had the attention of all present because they wanted to see an â€Å"engine† apologize for his incivility. However if he had not apologized for his outburst the pr... Free Essays on Sitting Bull Free Essays on Sitting Bull Sitting Bull, said to be driven by the spirit, became chief of the Sioux tribe at an early age. His leadership included the time during in which America began its explorations of â€Å"The Great West†. In their expansion, they simply pushed the Native Americans back with promises of land and equal opportunities that were available to the whites. Throughout his reign, Chief Sitting Bull led his tribe through a number of confrontations with the American Army. The most famous of which being the Battle of the little Big Horn. However, the subject of the speech I reviewed does not deal with battling, but rather the unkept promises the American government made to the Sioux. Hearings were being conducted in Washington to hear the complaints of those who had lost land or other items of value during the war. So, the Chief had left with a delegation of his people and headed to Washington to see what was being done about the complaints the representatives from their tribe had lodged. Upon their arrival, he confronted Senator John Logan, a former civil war hero, because he had learned that the senator refused to acknowledge a single complaint made by the Sioux representative. In reaction to Logan’s arrogance, Sitting Bull became angered and accused Logan of â€Å"acting like a man drunk with whiskey.† Realizing that anger and finger pointing would get him nothing, Sitting Bull returned the next day in hopes of repairing the damage caused the previous day. Though first and foremost he was making an apology, he still wanted to express his resentment toward the United States government for the broken treaties and lies they had made with the S ioux tribe. His introduction was somewhat expected by those attending the hearings, so it did not make much of an impact but probably had the attention of all present because they wanted to see an â€Å"engine† apologize for his incivility. However if he had not apologized for his outburst the pr...

Critical Analysis in a Literature Review - Proofeds Writin Tips

Critical Analysis in a Literature Review - Proofeds Writin Tips Critical Analysis in a Literature Review A literature review is vital to any in-depth research, providing a foundation your work will build upon. Familiarizing yourself with the existing literature allows you to identify current debates in the field, ensuring that your work is up-to-date and addresses significant questions. But a good literature review will require reading critically. This means deciding whether you agree or disagree with certain viewpoints, arguments and theories, rather than simply describing them. It also requires being able to spot the flaws and strengths of particular studies, which can in turn help when developing your own ideas. To make sure you do this effectively, its worth looking for the following things. 1. Overgeneralizations One common issue in research is the scope of its application, especially when dealing with limited sample sizes or when a study is generalized too broadly. The conclusions of a psychological study conducted with all male participants, for instance, may not be applicable in the same way to female subjects. 2. Methodological Limitations When writing a literature review, ask yourself whether the methods used for particular studies were appropriate. For example, whether the study used a quantitative, qualitative or mixed-methods research design can make a big difference to the conclusions reached. 3. How Well Explained is the Research? When reading for a critical literature review, it is important to consider how well written the studies you examine are. Does the author explain their methods? Is enough detail provided for any experiments to be replicated? Are sampling, data collection and analysis techniques clearly identified? Does the conclusion follow from the results? Asking these and similar questions will help you discern between good and bad research. 4. Identify Biases Another important factor is to consider whether implicit biases might have influenced the research. The term â€Å"confirmation bias,† for example, refers to the tendency to focus on evidence which supports one’s existing beliefs, which can lead to overlooking alternative hypotheses. 5. Challenge Your Own Assumptions If you come across a study which seems to oppose your hypothesis, consider whether it presents good counterarguments to your own position. If it does, ask yourself whether this affects how you conduct the rest of your research. The final point here is important because conducting a literature review serves two purposes. The finished literature review will help your reader to understand the background of your research, so critical analysis helps to clarify what your work contributes to the debate. But comparing different studies and theories for a literature review will also help you to develop a research approach. The better your critical analysis, then, the better prepared you’ll be.